Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Blood For Oil

(cross-posted at the Coaster...want links? Go get them over there, sorry, I haven't figured out how to do it here)

Riveted to HBO's brilliant docudrama series "Generation Kill" for the last two weeks, it's brought me back to the original build-up and initial invasion of Iraq. The days of yelling, "IRAQ?? What the hell are we doing?" Remembering those feelings and watching the young Marines crossing the border into Saddam Hussein's country with no air cover or tank assistance has made for quite an emotional viewing experience.

The announcement a few weeks ago of a deal being worked out between the Iraq Oil Ministry and Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP (original partners decades ago in the Iraq Petroleum Company, now joined by Chevron and other smaller oil companies) raises some serious questions about the nature of the invasion. Questions that should be raised and discussed by Obama, McCain, Congress, Americans everywhere, and the Iraqi people, who have no say in the future of their country.

These four companies got no-bid contracts, skipping right over 40-some others, including some in Russia, India and China. "There was suspicion among many in the Arab world and among parts of the American public that the United States had gone to war in Iraq precisely to secure the oil wealth these contracts seek to extract," Andrew E. Kramer wrote in the New York Times.

"Suspicion" is an understatement. Surely the military occupation is secretly setting up the hated Iraq Petroleum Company, which, as Seamus Milne of the Guardian points out, was put into place during British rule to "dine off Iraq's wealth in a famously exploitative deal."

Obviously the demand is great, and is there a bigger oil reserve anywhere on the globe, that is as easy to extract, as Iraq? No deep-sea drilling, no tar or ice to drill through, and we set up permanent military bases right there. Weapons of Mass Destruction? Saddam and bin Laden hand-in-hand? It would be laughable if not for all the senseless killings of our children in the name of easy oil.

None of this is new, but remember Bush and al-Maliki agreeing on that Declaration of Principles, which was signed without the approval of Congress, the Iraqi Parliment, or anyone else? Now we have gigantic military airports, the so-called embassy, which is basically one of the largest cities in the country. We have the understanding that Iraqi oil is to be open to investment, "especially American investments" is how the Declaration unbelievably reads. There can be no question as to why we invaded that country.

Bush's signing statement in January that he would bypass any Congressional rules keeping the U.S. from establishing any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq" or "to exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq" was illegal and violated Constitutional separation of powers. He pulled that one right out of his ass and got away with it, despite protests from the American Bar Association and Iraqi unions, which somehow still survive.

The United States has committed an international war crime in Iraq, one which has taken the lives of thousands of American troops and untold numbers of innocent Iraqi civilians. "Generation Kill" is a great reminder of the chaos that surrounded the initial invasion, from the perspective of the troops who risked, and often lost, their lives. It's a good time to remind ourselves what the reason was behind this tragic policy, and to demand that the two guys running for president not only acknowledge this fact, but explain to us how they would get our kids out of there.

Nobody should have to die over oil.

24 comments:

iamcoyote said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
The Masked Vigilante said...

We went to war over oil? Holy shit, did I fall asleep and wake up in 1990?

Kick 'em to the Hague.

Anonymous said...

Wow, some shirin character somehow found a reason to beat me up over there. I thought this was a post everyone could agree with. Not on the Coaster. It's not about oil it's about world dominance, and our soldiers are evil.

Heh.

snark said...

Shirin's a one-issue concern type.

If there's an angle to link a post to our "illegal atrocities in Iraq" he/she'll find it.

Short on alternatives though.

iamcoyote said...

Shirin is Iraqi, I think, and has family over there, obviously. He's always like that, so don't take it personally. He even gets on paradox's case when he "cries for the children." Sorry, I know you like paradox, but, oy, he's not as great a writer as he thinks he is. Too sappy for me sometimes with the dreaded flowery language my comp teacher warned me about years ago.

The Masked Vigilante said...

I shoved one back at Shirin in the comments.

The Fook has your six, brah.

Anonymous said...

I don't take anything personally, Coyote, don't worry 'bout me. I'm not looking for a Pulitzer.

And I hear ya on Paradox. He and I just kinda hit it off.

I notice that since Soto started rockin' over there Turkana slowed down. I don't know, why am I analyzing that place? It's pretty cool, and I have a log-in. I have a lot of ideas to write about all of a sudden. The Lefty Revolutionary is re-emerging in me. I may be seeing Rage Against The Machine a week from Saturday, too, headlining Lollapalooza. If I go I'm gonna do a Man On The Street Gonzo Journalism type deal. Seeing Rage always stokes my inner Lefty, though.

iamcoyote said...

Turkana's taken a beating on the Hillary stuff - deserved, partially. S/he hung onto the Hillary stuff a little longer than many people liked, in what seemed a deliberate effort to keep the divide going. And there was a thread that was nothing but "you're a poop," "no, you're a poop" between that idiot Geekesq and turk that was just silly.

So, RATM, eh? Is Chris Cornell still with them?

Anonymous said...

No, Cornell was with the band when they were called Audioslave. The original RATM had Zach de la Rocha as lead singer/songwriter. He's a bad ass rapper who is always jumping into protests in Mexico and S. America and his lyrics are all political. Hard-core, American democracy is a load of crap type of stuff. They've been playing overseas and are flying into Chicago just for this show, they have no other USA dates set up before they make a new album.

I liked Audioslave because it's such an amazing band, but the thing reaches a whole 'nother level of awesomeness with Zach. It's almost frightening. I've never seen anything like it.

iamcoyote said...

OMG - anthony on the open thread. Did he say what I think he said? I'm thinking of getting some Shakers to go give him what for.

Anonymous said...

Where do you see this anthony thing?

iamcoyote said...

On today's TLC open thread, towards the bottom. I'm there talking with him.

The Masked Vigilante said...

So, uh, anthony, for a woman to reach her true power, she needs to be raped and get over it, is that what you're saying? 'Cos that's what you're saying.

LOL!!! That's not what he was saying and you know it. It's a great comment though.

anthony would NEVER have gotten away with that shit over in Hatersville.

iamcoyote said...

anthony would NEVER have gotten away with that shit over in Hatersville.

Of course not, that's why I was thinking I should sic some Shakers on him. And I know exactly what he was saying - he asked about Lysistrata, a Greek comedy, as ann pointed out early in the conversation, wherein the title character enlists the women of several cities to deny their husbands sex until the wars were ended.

Read this if you want to understand the deep context when someone brings that up in the context of power. Because the inevitable conclusion by certain people is that my "gender has power." I've seen this before; women have the power because they can fucking say "no." And that's bullfuckingshit.

That's not our "power," though even if it was, it would still be better than Aquaman's lame gills.

In any case, I did understand what anthony was getting at with the power comment, he just didn't realize that someone out here has a different perception of what the context is so he thought he could get away with the comment.

What is this context you ask? This:

The play would have been highly comic to Aristophanes' contemporaries, because female power played out as a real possibility, would have been ludicrous. The "women" would have been played by men, and their inability to deal with the lack of sex and their addiction to alcohol fed into the dark, funny, stereotypes about women.

And even if he did understand that the context, it was still an insensitive remark after Anjha had posted those links about rape statistics. I'm sorry, maybe I've spent too much time at "Hatersville," (ya knob), but man, his comment burned me.

snark said...

Anthony consistantly demonstrates an utter lack of sensitivity to anything other than even the slightest slight towards blacks.

Which is why I enjoy ripping his comments so much.

snark said...

Plug "Holger Danske" into an Anagram Generator and you get some pretty funny results.

iamcoyote said...

I feel like you're trying to tell me something and I'm totally missing the point.

snark said...

No. Just fun with anagrams.

Sorry.

The Masked Vigilante said...

he asked about Lysistrata, a Greek comedy

And here I always thought the "Pussy Embargo" idea was from an old Eddie Murphy stand-up bit.

I get what he was doing and what you were doing -- I think it's awesome. I gotta go back and see how it turned out. Fuck that guy.

Besides, who references a Greek comedy in response to rape statistics? A pseudo-intellectual prick.

Tool.

iamcoyote said...

Yeah, I'm working on an answer, running late today...

iamcoyote said...

Okay, if you're still interested, I put up a reply. Not sure anyone will see it, but it was fun to clarify my own thoughts!

Anonymous said...

MV, did you see "Generation Kill" when Iceman's hilarious driver Ray gives his theory on lack of pussy is what harms a country? "If Saddam spent half as much money on his pussy infrastructure as he did on his gay, weak-ass army, we wouldn't be here." The Rolling Stone guy's like, "It's an interesting theory, though. So this war has nothing really to do with Saddam or WMD's or..." Ray: "No, every world crisis always comes down to pussy."

iamcoyote said...

Hmm. I guess you hadda be there, huh?

The Masked Vigilante said...

Yeah, I saw that. That's the kinda guy who'd volunteer for that shit.